Cuevani Screening · for teams reviewing applications in batches
Your rubric. Evidence you can review.
Bring an application batch and a clear rubric. Record your first assessment before revealing model scores, then review the evidence together.
Discuss Screening setupGuided enrollment · Availability confirmed before payment
Source excerpt
“The application describes leading a community project, but does not state the project outcome.”
Example category: Human assessment comes first
Your independent assessment comes first. Then compare the rubric evidence and note what is missing.
Human review: your team keeps the decision.What your team reviews
Blind-first human assessment
Keep the work organized around the way your team actually handles it.
Per-criterion evidence
Inspect the original text and the reason for the suggestion together.
No automated rejections, ever
Correct the result, record your review, and decide what happens next.
Set up this workflow
We scope one workflow, confirm source access, define your starter rulebook, and review a permitted sample with you. Your team approves the rules and retains control of decisions.
Legal intake supports administration, not legal advice. Screening never rejects applicants. Return flags are review prompts, not findings of fraud.
+ $1,000 USD one-time setup
Discounted annual enrollment: ask for the confirmed annual quote before subscribing.
See pricing and enrollment detailsTell us what needs review.
Describe what comes in, where it arrives, and what your team needs to do next. We’ll discuss the workflow, source access and setup.
Discuss your workflowNo payment details are needed for a workflow conversation.